1601 E. 5th St. #109

Austin, Texas 78702

United States


Module 002/2, Ground Floor, Tidel Park

Elcosez, Aerodome Post

Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641014 India


138G Grays Hill

Opp. BSNL GM Office, Sims Park

Coonoor, Tamil Nadu 643101 India


Block 7, Lot 5,

Camella Homes Bermuda,

Phase 2B, Brgy. Banlic,

City of Cabuyao, Laguna,


San Jose

Escazu Village

Calle 118B, San Rafael

San Jose, SJ 10203

Costa Rica

News & Insights

News & Insights

Crowdsourced v. User-Generated

Large media companies are moving away from paying in-house staff to create proprietary online content and favoring two lower-cost models for content creation — user-generated content (UGC) and crowdsourcing-generated content (CGC). Since these two approaches are often confused with each other, it’s worth looking more closely at the real differences between them.

UGC is just that: ancillary content (ratings, reviews, etc.) provided free of charge to content-driven sites by users. CGC is where paid crowd workers create the core information product itself. [When users supply content for free through user polls, contests, etc., this is often described as crowdsourced. It’s more accurately called UGC.]

So which approach is “better”? Well, they each have their benefits and drawbacks.

UGC appears to be “free,” but it carries substantial costs for curation via filters, editors, and/or moderators because:

  • Users exaggerate or are simply dishonest
  • People are more apt to write about negative experiences than positive ones
  • Users often violate copyright laws

Well-known commercial examples of UGC include:

  • Yelp, where users post their experiences and opinions about retail stores, services, and restaurants.
  • Local news sites where citizens with mobile phones post photos of a local events for republication.
  • LinkedIn, where users write content about themselves that often reflects only their positive qualities.

CGC is often cheaper than in-house content creation, but its costs are often wildly underestimated. Some of these costs include:

  • Highly specialized training and credentialing before a project starts
  • Sub-routines to ensure consistent quality (i.e., editorial/QA reviews)
  • Moderators to prevent dissemination of inappropriate content
  • Software to prevent “gaming the system” in various ways
  • An experienced crowdsourcing manager to design processes and to train and qualify a group of crowd workers exactly suited for the specific task at hand.

The choice between the potentially unwieldy crowd or amateur user-generated content can be tricky. One thing’s for sure, though. Content creation still requires managers who can handle complex information processes, even if the content’s provenance is out-of-house.

Keep on top of the information industry 
with our ‘Data Content Best Practices’ newsletter:

Keep on top of the information industry with our ‘Data Content Best Practices’ newsletter: